Law as a Eurocentric Enterprise

Image: First page of the article, from the University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository (opens in a new tab). Copyright of the rights holder; shown to identify the article.
About this source
Overview
A critical analysis of the relationship between Western legal traditions and racial power.
Archive description, not yet verified against the work. It is not a settled account of the work.
Publication details
- Type
- Journal article
- Author
- Kenneth B. Nunn
- Published in
- Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323–372
- Year
- 1997
Citation
Nunn, Kenneth B. “Law as a Eurocentric Enterprise.” Law and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice 15, no. 2 (1997): 323–372.
As written in the source bibliography.
Read the source
Explore its connections
People
Related concepts
Law & Justice
Legal systems, rights, and state power
Concept tags are provisional.
Cited in
Related sources
Race, Racism, and American Law: Leading Cases and Materials, 2023
Aspen Publishing, Frederick, MD
Critical Race Judgments: Rewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
We Charge Genocide: The Crime of Government against the Negro People
Civil Rights Congress, New York
Community questions
Can law be politically neutral?
How do scholars such as Kenneth Nunn critique the claim that law is neutral, and what do their arguments suggest about the relationship between legal systems, racial power, and democracy?
Record provenance and review status
- Bibliographic source
Law as a Eurocentric EnterpriseKenneth B. NunnLaw and Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 323–372
The citation above is reproduced as written in the source bibliography.
- Record origin
Listed in the bibliography for CollectionsIn Class with CarrEp. 344.
- Editorial status
- Metadata: not yet reviewed
- Overview: not yet reviewed
- Concept associations: not yet reviewed
Review status concerns the archive’s representation of this work, not the scholarly validity of the work itself.
- Limitations
- Publication details restate the citation and have not been checked against the work.
- The overview is an unverified description.
- Concept associations are provisional.
